Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ)
Description
The ASQ is a 48-item questionnaire that measures an individual’s explanatory style (positive versus negative). The questionnaire is made up of 12 hypothetical events (6 good and 6 bad), each followed by 4 questions: (1) a free-response question about the cause of the hypothetical event, (2) a question about whether the event has an internal or external cause (i.e., how much respondents believe they themselves are responsible for the event) (3) a question about whether the event has a stable or unstable cause (i.e., how much respondents believe the cause of the event is present over time), (4) a question about whether the event has a global or specific cause (i.e., how much the respondents believe the cause of the event occurs across varying conditions).The ASQ is a 48-item questionnaire that measures an individual’s explanatory style (positive versus negative). The questionnaire is made up of 12 hypothetical events (6 good and 6 bad), each followed by 4 questions: (1) a free-response question about the cause of the hypothetical event, (2) a question about whether the event has an internal or external cause (i.e., how much respondents believe they themselves are responsible for the event) (3) a question about whether the event has a stable or unstable cause (i.e., how much respondents believe the cause of the event is present over time), (4) a question about whether the event has a global or specific cause (i.e., how much the respondents believe the cause of the event occurs across varying conditions).
Test Features
Administration details
N/A
Timeframe:Not specified.
Approx time: 15-30 minutesAccessing the assessment and manual information
License details
No, the assessments costs USD$20 (one payment per study)
License details:- For details on how to apply for a licence, see: https://ppc.sas.upenn.edu/services/optimism-assessment
Reliability and Validity
- Xenikou, A., Furnham, A., & McCarrey, M. (1997). Attributional style for negative events: A proposition for a more reliable and valid measure of attributional style. British Journal of Psychology, 88(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02620.x